Comments on: X-UA-Bloated http://www.willoller.com/x-ua-bloated/ Learning to match the beat of the Old World man. Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:41:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: will http://www.willoller.com/x-ua-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-10645 will Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:16:57 +0000 http://www.willoller.com/x-ua-bloated/#comment-10645 The memory use would increase dramatically, but consider how much memory you let Firefox take up at any given time. Right now (with gMail open in all 3 browsers) IE7 and 6 are using 68M and 26M (respectively) while Firefox (with Firebug and a bunch of tabs) is sitting pretty at 412M. The memory use would increase dramatically, but consider how much memory you let Firefox take up at any given time.
Right now (with gMail open in all 3 browsers) IE7 and 6 are using 68M and 26M (respectively) while Firefox (with Firebug and a bunch of tabs) is sitting pretty at 412M.

]]> By: Web Viewpoint http://www.willoller.com/x-ua-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-10644 Web Viewpoint Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:47:47 +0000 http://www.willoller.com/x-ua-bloated/#comment-10644 This seems like a decent idea, but I think it will take more memory having all those binaries loaded if you happen to visit various sites requiring different versions. But, then again their current implementation in IE8 might be just as bad in eating up memory. <a href="http://blog.vftw.com/view/browsers/ie8-taking-quirks-and-hacks-into-the-future/" rel="nofollow">My take on this whole "super standards compliance" mode.</a> This seems like a decent idea, but I think it will take more memory having all those binaries loaded if you happen to visit various sites requiring different versions.

But, then again their current implementation in IE8 might be just as bad in eating up memory.

My take on this whole “super standards compliance” mode.

]]>