Thank goodnes. The case was heard back in August, after a judge denied AT&T’s motion to dismiss.
Violations of our privacy by private companies are as dangerous as those by big government; keep your eyes open.
“NEVER spray into an enclosed space, such as a trash can or paper shredder.”
Or a computer!? That’s a pretty enclosed space, and pretty much the only thing these cans of air get used on.
Is the chemical (difluoroethane) really so dangerous? The LD-50 is rather difficult to find.
Intentional direct exposure to this chemical can cause freezing of airway soft tissue, oxygen displacement, or sensitization of myocardium. Human data also indicate that 1,1-difluoroethane is irritating to the eyes, nose, and throat. A case of severe oral mucosal frostbite injury from intentional abuse of 1,1-difluoroethane has been reported in the literature.4 This acute toxicity information is much more relevant to characterizing human hazards than a rat LD-50 value. (source)
Am I missing something here? I am confident in my ability to avoid frostbite (that liquid is COLD), but if the acute toxicity is so severe, why is it used as a propellant for a product used almost exclusively on electronics and in enclosed spaces?
My brain cells are very dear to me. Does anyone out there use a better (safer) canned-air propellant?
Only Disney’s lawyers can defeat terrorism now.
You probably shouldn’t watch this if you love Mickey Mouse or Palestinians.
Via Cartoon Brew
Also: Palestinian Media Watch
Continue
These posts are popular.
I like reading these blogs. Also, I know the people that make them.
Stay updated on my meandering thoughts & activities via RSS (Syndicate).
